The information age has quickly expanded the variety of evidence that can be admissible in a courtroom. Government bodies at this point acknowledge the notification of digital evidence, which has now allowed law enforcement personnel to arrest and prosecute people based on the information content of their personal computers, digital cameras, online sites and mobile devices.
Computer data usually has to be kept for some time before it makes an appearance in court – at times weeks, months or even years. Aside from that, it regularly must be utilized by several individuals during this process leading up to a trial. A secured data storage method must be in position to maintain the evidence all through the pre-trial procedure.
Having said that, digital evidence storage has welcomed with it numerous legal and technological challenges.
The foremost concern with electronic evidence is the risk of tampering. Contrary to solid physical evidence, digital evidence is quickly edited and altered. For instance, it's very simple to modify a cell's value in an Excel spreadsheet – a value which may possibly correspond to the cash worth of a firm's fraudulent charges. Prior to now, courts through the world shared apprehension over the legitimacy of digital evidence, and have on a number of situations ruled it out as inadmissible.
The second disadvantage to digital evidence is logistical and technical. Law enforcement powers in many countries are rapidly acquiring massive quantity of digital evidence, and many permissions are unable to handle this glut of data. Law enforcement measures are not conventionally outfitted to upload, index, store and selectively permit access to massive quantities of information. Preserving properly secured records storage and easy access has shown to be a nuisance for numerous departments.
These are definitely equally complicated problems. In spite of this, the latest advancement in contemporary secured data storage has resulted in the progress of digital evidence data storage techniques intended to resolve these types of issues.
An ideal digital evidence storage program enables law enforcement officers to conveniently submit data from computers, digital cameras and digital recorders via terminals fitted in the department. Employing a web-based program with backups at numerous destinations, these types of systems are built to establish a worry-free future.
The program controls “read” access to numerous end users, and logs access from all of the end users that gain access to the computer data. Also it constricts printing and duplicating to a select bunch of people – for example, the lead of forensics and its superiors.
These methods deal with the primary issues with digital evidence storage: tampering and efficiency. By making it possible for officers to add evidence via a terminal, evidence is put through the system quickly, with minimum man-hours required. The restricted entry and user records of activity offer limitations and security against tampering.
Digital evidence is a brand new and quickly growing phenomenon – we can be expecting it to play a more fundamental part in legal proceedings seeing that individuals place increasingly more information in electronic formats. Totally secured data storage has become essential, as well as systems that enable law enforcement to process it successfully.